Just had a chance to watch the recording of the latest
County Council meeting. It started off well with Councillors from all parties
vowing to fight the Police & Crime Commissioner’s plan to take control of
the fire & rescue service. The Leader of the Council, Louise Goldsmith, rightly praised the
good work of firefighters across the County, but then appeared to
claim that this was because of how the Council runs the service.
As anyone who has followed their management of the service
will know, Louise Goldsmith’s party has closed four operational fire stations,
cut operational fire engines by 24%, left wholetime crewed fire engines with
bare minimum crews, presided over a drop in retained fire engine availability
from 90% to 60%, and ‘achieved’ an increase in response times.
The fire & rescue service’s operational and preventative achievements are the result
of the determination and commitment of firefighters, and have little to do with County Council management. So the real issue is not the distraction of our firefighters’ achievements, but who should manage the service. I don’t
believe that PCC control is the right way forward, but this County Council’s
record is not a good one.
Just look at Mrs Goldsmith’s claim that their democratic
accountability and transparency meets the Home Secretary’s aspirations. The Cabinet
system has seriously reduced accountability and transparency in West Sussex, especially
when Conservative Councillors are in the majority and won’t challenge their Leader.
When other Councillors express concern about problems or failings in the fire
& rescue service, Cabinet Member David Barling just dismisses their
concerns and expects that to be the end of the matter. His recent refusal to
let County Councillors investigate concerns is not democratic accountability,
and failing to provide accurate performance information is certainly not
transparent.
If you needed further confirmation of this, you only had to
listen to David Barling later in the meeting. Dr James Walsh pointed out that Mr
Barling had misled the Council at the last meeting when he said, “Hampshire
Fire & Rescue don’t actually come a great deal in to West Sussex,
approximately its about 50 times every year”. The average figure over the last
five years is in fact 145 times per
year, and that is just to attend West Sussex incidents. They also come in to West Sussex several times
a year to standby at fire stations, but those figures are not even recorded.
So, did Mr Barling apologise for misleading the Council? No,
he misled them again by suggesting he was just talking about Emsworth. As you can see from the exact quote above he was not. To make matters worse, like
some petulant teenager, he complained about the way Dr Walsh phrased the
question. An accountable and transparent Cabinet Member would have humbly
apologised for the error, assuming of course that it was a simple mistake and
not an attempt to deliberately mislead.
Louise Goldsmith also suggested that West Sussex was meeting
the Home Secretary’s aspirations for ‘greater collaboration with other
emergency services’, and ‘opportunities for joint working and commissioning’,
so is that true, or another weakness? Well, as Geoffrey Theobald, leader of the
Conservatives on Brighton and Hove City Council, says, “I don’t think that West
Sussex County Council are helping their case by continually rejecting a merger
of the two brigades which both East Sussex County Council and Brighton and Hove
City Council have supported over the years.”
In addition, West Sussex pulled out of a deal to merge
vehicle procurement and maintenance with the other emergency services in Sussex
and Surrey. Government funding was available for this project, but West Sussex
decided to go solo with a part in-house and part private contract for this
function. To give the illusion of it being an emergency services collaboration,
they said it would be 'available' to other emergency services, yet it is in
direct competition with the Surrey/Sussex project.
Louise Goldsmith’s confidence that the Home Secretary would
be convinced by her ‘excellent model’ is, I fear, sadly misplaced. Significant
changes and improvements are required if she is to stand any chance of
convincing Theresa May that the fire & rescue service is safe in her hands.
No comments:
Post a Comment