Deception
Latest figures show how West Sussex County Council's poor fire service response times are getting even worse. It is the result of closing fire stations, cutting a quarter of the county's fire engines, and failing to ensure the remaining ones are always crewed.
Most of the county's fire engines depend on retained (on call) firefighters who are called from their homes or work when an emergency is received. Figures in the latest report to WSCC's Fire & Rescue Service Scrutiny Committee show that those fire engines cannot be crewed more often than they can be crewed.
In the report to Councillors, the chart on adequate crewing is coloured all blue, conveniently ignoring the red, amber, green mentioned in the text. The chart below is properly coloured and goes back to 2011/12, the first year of the cuts.
Source - West Sussex County Council reports
Deceiving councillors & the public is unacceptable
Cover up
A member of the public asked for this availability information on a station by station basis, via a Freedom of Information request, but this was refused. The reason given was, “Disclosure of the
information you seek would be likely to endanger the physical or mental health of
any individual or the safety of any individual.”
A ludicrous reason as that very information used to be available online on the Council’s performance dashboard, and it has been provided on request previously. The removal from the performance dashboard in 2019, along with other performance information, was presumably
to cover up deteriorating performance.
Council conspiracy theories
The refusal goes onto claim that the data, “could
be used to target certain areas at specific times, which could, in turn,
endanger both members of the public in those areas and the firefighters
involved in any such incidents.”
Imaginary people plotting imaginary action to target areas
in some imaginary way is utterly fanciful. Especially so, as the data requested
would not contain ‘specific times,’ just a percentage of hours a fire engine
was unavailable in the past. Availability is ever changing, so past data could not be used to predict future availability.
Publishing this data could actually be
positive. Public awareness of stations that are struggling to crew their fire
engines could well aid recruitment and encourage local employers
to release retained firefighters to improve availability.
This misuse of legislation is not to prevent a threat,
it is to cover up West Sussex County Council's failure to protect the public
44% increase in time taken to reach serious fires
When an emergency call is received, and the nearest fire engine is not crewed, it means another has to attend from a fire station further away. Latest Home Office figures show how the average travelling time for the first fire engine has, since 2010/11, increased by 44%. That is a 19% greater increase than the average across England. This is the combined effect of the Council's significant cuts to the service, and their failure to properly crew fire engines.
The figures are even more disturbing when you realise that,
in 2022, over 70% of incidents were in areas covered by the six fire stations
crewed by wholetime firefighters round the clock. Their travel times are
unlikely to have increased, which means that in the areas covered by the other
18 fire stations the increase must have been significantly greater than the 44%
average increase.
Only six fire stations with a wholetime crew 24 hours a day
Bognor Regis, Chichester, Crawley, Horsham, Littlehampton & Worthing
The other 18 fire stations depend wholly, or partly, on having enough retained firefighters available. When they are not available, those fire stations are effectively closed.
West Sussex County Council makes excuses, but takes no effective action
Instead of positive action to find solutions, the Council's Cabinet Member, Duncan Crow, fiddles whilst West Sussex burns. He expects local employers to release retained firefighters to attend emergencies during working hours, but the Council's Cabinet has refused to approve a policy to allow their own staff to do the same.
The County Council's Cabinet should have been setting an example by encouraging council staff to be retained firefighters, fully supporting them with paid time off for initial training, and allowing them to work remotely at or near a fire station. They cannot expect other employers and the self employed to solve this problem when they set such a poor example.
County Councillors must remember that the legal duty to provide an effective fire & rescue service is their responsibility alone. So, how many County Councillors have approached parish councils, partner organisations, businesses, community groups etc., where retained firefighters are needed? It would appear very few, if any.
Sadly, the Scrutiny Committee once again kicked this down the road this week, because 30 minutes was thought not long enough. Well yes, it is not long enough but why are they not holding an urgent special meeting about such terrible performance?
If County Councillors won't solve the retained firefighter shortage, they must fund more wholetime firefighters to protect West Sussex residents
Conflict of interest
I have recently seen two freedom of information requests related to the Chief Fire Officer's commercial activities. One asked how many of the
'Service Executive Board' attended
the Chief Fire Officer’s book launch earlier this year in an official capacity, and if they claimed expenses. The response was that none attended officially and that no expenses were claimed. It did not say how many attended.
More concerning is that promoting this book, which is about gender bias, appears to have been given higher priority than a meeting of the Fire & Rescue Service Scrutiny Committee. It appears the scheduled meeting clashed with the book launch and was cancelled, which meant County Councillors had to find time for a rearranged meeting.
The Chief Fire Officer's commercial book promotion should not be a higher priority than a County Council scrutiny meeting.
Double Standards
The other request concerned the
Chief Fire Officer's secondary employment as a public speaker, and referred to an agency that arranges her paid speaking engagements. The reply says that she has County Council approval for this secondary employment, which
must not conflict with the Council's interests or her employment responsibilities.
The Council also says that this secondary employment is restricted to periods of leave and in their own time. However, Chief Fire Officers don't have set hours and predecessors used to insist that they were always on duty and available. The response confirmed that no other chief officer employed by the County Council indulges in secondary employment.
The County Council has previously dismissed firefighters when their secondary employment had any connection with firefighting, fire safety, or their employment as a firefighter. This was not because of a proven conflict of interest, but because there could be. Yet the Chief Fire Officer's paid speaking engagements will inevitably have a connection with the fire & rescue service and her County Council role.
Of course, other chief fire officers have attended speaking engagements but, as far as I am aware, none have been paid to do so. They have always accepted it as part of their responsibility as a chief fire officer. They also often attended fire station open days, community events, meetings with local organisations, and local fund raising events for The Fire Fighters Charity in the evening or at weekends. Prioritising a commercial book launch over a scrutiny committee meeting suggests a conflict of interest. At the very least, attending paid speaking engagements up and down the country must result in less time for the Chief Fire Officer's primary responsibility to the residents of West Sussex.
Dismayed firefighters have said that they have more chance of seeing their Chief Fire Officer talking about her life on television, than they do of seeing her at their fire station to listen to their concerns. There is much to admire about this Chief Fire Officer, but concerns being raised about her priorities and conflict of interest are worrying.
Who monitors the Chief Fire Officer's secondary employment to ensure there is no conflict with her primary employment?
