Items covered
One of Eddie Howland's superb images showing West Sussex firefighters at work |
- Deceitful West Sussex Support for Hampshire Fire Cuts.
- Has Murphy’s Law scuppered Mr Barling’s ‘Super-duper’ 6x6?
- Appeal Decisions Show Cabinet Member’s Claim of Openness is False.
- Hampshire cuts detail.
- County Councillors can’t get details on your Fire & Rescue Service.
- Worst ever response times.
- Government want Police & Crime Commissioners to take over Fire & Rescue Service.
- Real statistics.
- Petition thank you & Councillor investigation refused.
- Real firefighters care.
Deceitful West Sussex Support for Hampshire Fire Cuts
Last September County Council
Leader Louise Goldsmith insisted that West Sussex would not make any comment on
the Hampshire cuts. Yet within weeks a West Sussex officer had been seconded to Hampshire for six months to help them promote their cuts. Then the Hampshire consultation report clearly showed that, not only did West Sussex comment,
they actually supported the cuts.
Were we deliberately misled in
September, or did the Chief Fire Officer ignore the Leader’s policies and
instructions? The Leader’s subsequent lame excuse for this - “at the time we weren't going
to respond, but we did and we are where we are”.
The West Sussex submission even stated
concerns about increased response times
and a less effective response in parts
of West Sussex, west of Chichester and Midhurst. Councillor Goldsmith refused
to give any assurance that Councillors will now take action to fill the gap created
by the Hampshire cuts.
"Concerns within West Sussex - increases in response times; and changes in the number of
firefighters and type of equipment" (Hampshire Fire & Rescue Service Consultation Report)
Most Hampshire fire engines near the border are to be replaced with converted
vans, often carrying just two
firefighters. Yet, task analysis shows at least four firefighters are needed for safe
operations at all incidents.
Has Murphy’s Law Scuppered Mr Barling’s ‘Super-duper’ 6x6?
In 2014, when residents expressed
concerns about losing the second fire engines at Midhurst, Petworth and
Storrington, they were told that much improved light, off road vehicles ‘would be in place’
before the cuts. Cabinet Member David Barling even talked about ‘super-duper’
vehicles, so where are they?
Previous and existing light off road vehicles
|
The not very light 'super-duper' replacement (W H Bence photo)
|
Well the ‘super-duper’ 6-wheel
drive version is reported to first have been overweight on the front axle and
then, after re-building, overweight on the rear axle.
Is Murphy’s Law to blame, or is
it the result of a poorly conceived idea, with inadequate research, and no
business case, combined with poor project management?
All the indications suggest the
latter, but WSCC is refusing to release
all the information on the project. How much this fiasco has cost West
Sussex residents has not been disclosed.
Murphy’s Law (if it can go wrong, it will go wrong)
Appeal Decisions Show Cabinet Member’s Claim of Openness is False
Cabinet Member David Barling has claimed
that West Sussex Fire & Rescue Service ‘prides itself on its openness’. Yet
decisions by the Information Commissioner and the General Regulatory Chamber show
that he is wrong.
Two Freedom of Information appeal
decisions, regarding WSF&RS, have confirmed that the County Council failed to comply
with the legislation. A decision on a third is awaited.
"the Council did not properly apply section 12", "section 16 had not been complied with"
"It did not seem to us that the Council’s estimate had been shown to be reasonable"
"The Council must disclose all information held by it which falls within the Appellant’s refined request"
Even more astonishing was the Council’s
response to a FOI request submitted by someone to all fire & rescue services. Dozens
of them happily provided the information and London Fire Brigade even make theirs
available on the internet. Yet WSF&RS
refused to provide it and claimed that it would "threaten national security".
A ridiculous claim. The more likely
reason is their paranoia about releasing any data that will confirm WSF&RS’s deteriorating performance.
Hampshire Cuts Detail
All border stations, except
Havant, are staffed by part-time firefighters, yet there will be 24 less of
them. Proper fire engines (minimum crew 4) being lost are:
Horndean – their fire
engine will be replaced with an Intermediate Vehicle. This is a smaller fire
engine that carries less water, equipment and firefighters (minimum crew 2).
Emsworth, Grayshott, Liphook - their fire engines will be replaced
by First Response Vehicles (minimum crew 2). These carry even less water, equipment and
firefighters than the Intermediate Vehicle.
Waterlooville, Petersfield, Havant
– One proper fire engine kept, with the second one at each station being replaced with a First Response Vehicle (minimum crew 2).
Claims about new technology are exaggerated. It won’t save your life and
is of no use at most incidents – you
need at least 4 firefighters!
WSF&RS Task Analysis - used to assess the minimum number of
firefighters
needed at incidents, just to enable essential, simultaneous tasks to be carried out safely.
No incident type required less than four firefighters.
Building fires required not less than nine firefighters.
County Councillors Can’t Get Details on Your Fire & Rescue Service
In February 2015, Councillors
James Walsh and Michael Jones submitted questions on the service’s performance.
They were told that the information would be provided monthly, but none has been published.
They asked for information about response
times not being met, part-time firefighter availability falling below target
and when less than 28 fire engines are available. Something County Councillors should monitor and information that should be available to the public.
They were also told that details
of fire stations responding to calls would be restored to the incident
newsletter on the Council’s website. Although this was initially done, within
months they stopped providing any details at all on the WSCC website.
County Councillor Andy Petch asked for performance information affecting
the residents he represents. Astonishingly, he was accused of wasting officer time!
Worst Ever Response Times
House fires 13% worse - Outdoor fires 17% worse
(Increased Response Time change for first fire engine 2013-14 to 2014-15)
House fires 13% worse - Outdoor fires 17% worse
(Increased Response Time change for first fire engine 2013-14 to 2014-15)
Government figures released last
year show that West Sussex Fire & Rescue Service now has the worst response times in the south-east.
Other fire & rescue service response times have deteriorated, but West
Sussex, which once had the best response times, is now the worst.
The figures are average times for
the arrival of the first fire engine. Yet the response time in many rural areas,
and for second fire engines, appear to have increased significantly. Those
response times have not been published.
Government Want Police & Crime Commissioners
to Take Over Fire
& Rescue Service
This is the latest piece of
nonsense from the Government that is
likely to lead to further cuts. The idea is not supported by evidence and is just
based on very naïve and seriously flawed ideas.
The police and the fire &
rescue services necessarily have different
functions, training, procedures, vehicles, IT, control rooms and location requirements.
They do work together from time to time, and their procedures for doing so are
effective, but most of their work does not involve the other service.
Police & Crime Commissioners
are fully occupied in monitoring the police. They cannot take on the same role
for fire & rescue without reducing their effectiveness at monitoring the
police.
The system is also heavily
dependent on the effectiveness of the individual. Some PCCs have been
ineffective and putting them in charge of fire & rescue would be a disaster
for both services.
With PCC elections in May it is
worth mentioning that Labour and Liberal Democrat candidates in Sussex are on record as
saying that they would not seek control of your fire & rescue service.
What is particularly worrying about these plans is that West Sussex
County Council's mismanagement of the fire & rescue service only serves to help
the Government’s case. If it is to be stopped, Louise Goldsmith and David Barling need to start running our fire &
rescue service properly.
"The PCC webcasts her monthly Performance & Accountability Meetings with the Sussex Police Chief Constable.
These meetings are an opportunity for the Commissioner to hold the Chief Constable to account
on behalf of the public in an open and transparent way" (Sussex PCC website)
These meetings are an opportunity for the Commissioner to hold the Chief Constable to account
on behalf of the public in an open and transparent way" (Sussex PCC website)
We can see and hear the Sussex PCC question the Chief Constable, but the meetings between the Chief Fire Officer and the Cabinet Member are held in secret. That is not effective scrutiny, accountability or monitoring of performance?
The National Audit Office also voiced concern last year - "The fire sector is different from other emergency services in not having an external inspectorate". Regarding local scrutiny they said, "There are shortcomings in these local arrangements", and "councillors generally lack independent technical support".
Real Statistics
There has been a lot of
misleading spin about fewer calls. If you look at actual figures for the two
incident types that most threaten life, and over a longer period, you will see
a very different reality. These are ten year averages for the 1980s and for the
last ten years in West Sussex.
Fires in the Home
Much smaller reduction than they claim |
Road Traffic Collisions
More than doubled |
Fire Engine Cuts
24% fewer fire engines available |
Petition Thank You & Councillor Investigation Refused
Thank you to all who signed the
petition against cuts to West Sussex Fire & Rescue Service, and to those
who worked so hard collecting signatures. Nearly 4,000 people signed, which
prompted a County Council debate.
Sadly, Cabinet Member David
Barling insulted petitioners by dismissing their concerns as ‘disinformation’.
Most of the information supporting the petition was official County Council information, so either that was official
disinformation, or he was just resorting to bluff and bluster.
Most despicable was his callous
disregard for those who will die as a result of the cuts. Council research predicted
an extra death every other year,
information that they tried to hide. Now Mr Barling simply told Councillors to
“put it out of your heads”.
That's a disgusted me having to listen to Cabinet Member David Barling
disgracefully telling County Councillors to put extra deaths "out of your heads"
|
Independent, Labour, Liberal
Democrat and UKIP Councillors all voiced serious concerns, but the ruling Conservatives
arrogantly ignored a proposal from Independent County Councillor Andy Petch for a Councillor Task Group to investigate.
Only those with something to hide would
oppose a proper investigation!
Conservative cuts and
mismanagement have resulted in a rapidly deteriorating service. Poor fire
engine availability, increased response times, training deficiencies and
inadequate crewing are just some of the problems. Cutting fire crews by a
quarter meant that this was sadly inevitable.
Mr Barling owes residents an apology for his disgraceful and disrespectful comments
during the debate, and for covering up the service’s deteriorating performance.
Rest assured, we will continue to speak out on behalf of those who
genuinely care about their fire & rescue service.
Real Firefighters Care
Despite cuts to West Sussex Fire & Rescue Service, firefighters still
work hard to help everyone. They are disillusioned with a lack of support from
County Councillors and the Government, but when you are in trouble they will
still do their utmost to help you. You can always rely on those firefighters who arrive on fire engines to help you – eventually!
Will rescue arrive in time? It did here - just. |
For More Information
(click on
links)
See other posts on: wsfrscuts.blogspot.com
Or join the
discussion on Facebook:
Freedom of
Information Requests at:
Thanks, Tony, for doing the research and bringing us the truth. If this stuff was in the newspapers there would be such a public outcry. Hope everyone who reads it shares it.
ReplyDeleteThanks Linda, some of the local newspapers seem happy to print any press release, often unedited, from the Fire & Rescue Service or from the County Council. Unfortunately, they seem less keen to print any reports of failings in the way the Fire & Rescue Service and the County Council are run. They have all been sent this content, so it will be interesting to see if any of them use it.
DeleteThese carry even less water, equipment and firefighters than the Intermediate Vehicle.blackmonmooring.com
ReplyDelete